Search results

I rest my case.

Not with drinking, if that's what you mean.

Did you miss the first post of this thread?

Um, there has been numerous threads on the subject over the years on several forums, so no, it merely got stirred up again because someone at Dodge finally had enough. And rightfully so. Oddly enough, there is still always someone trying to defend leaving them on.

And there's reason number 84 to take them off and keep them pristine. You'll wear yours (and the splitter) out, then what?

No! I have two sets, but I'm sure as heck not going to sell them or give them to anyone. With my luck someone would install them on their Challenger, and then I'll either see them in photos or in person.

Now that is sexist, Hunter. Or at least very un PC.

Maybe somebody makes a bra for Challengers? Those were also fairly hideous, and supposedly screwed up the paint, too.

I have no personal experience since I removed my protectors as soon as I got the car off the trailer. But I've read many accounts of people having scratched splitters once the protectors are removed. Which makes sense to me, especially after seeing all the dirt already underneath mine when...

Why did I post "that nonsense" about the Demon being speed limited? Because I knew about it. Otherwise pointing out that a flexible splitter may work on a Demon wouldn't have made any sense. Or maybe it doesn't anyway? I thought it did. Anyway, normally I keep it below 120 or so, and 160 is...

I was well aware of that, but unfortunately it doesn't make a flexible splitter any more feasible on a Demon. On the contrary. Either way, if the splitter is indeed designed wrong as you stated, I would love to have one that's even more effective. And there's probably a market for such a thing...

Maybe pliable rubber could work on a Demon with it's relatively low top speed, but I wouldn't want the splitter to start flopping in the "breeze" when approaching Hellcat top speeds. I'm fairly certain that the splitters are not pliable, and shaped and placed where they are, for a reason.

And here I never had any interest in cloning...until you pointed out the ultimate reason.

To them it's probably a bit like if daVinci saw Mona Lisa with a mustache added.

I understand your position on this, but, you have an unfair advantage. You can happily drive along without having to see the dang things, but what about the rest of us that can't look away fast enough?!?

I dunno. FCA made the choice for me.

We're friends, and it was worse for him than for us. Ended up ordering a second one once the initial order was confirmed AWOL, so he got stuck with the original car, in a very small town. I felt sorry for him.

It just so happens that there's a new (never sold) Porsche 918 in Colorado Springs. With a rating of 67 mpg, it may work for you?

That's good, it must have improved then. I got all kinds of false info from chat, but the dealer had the actual facts. Not that they were the facts I wanted to hear.. That was about a year ago, and that infamous order was shipped three times according to chat. When the car finally showed up at...

Does it seem like the accuracy of what chat claims has improved any? Not that it could've become worse, but I am curious.